In the News

Haynes and Boone Highlighted in Chambers USA 2013

Haynes and Boone, LLP has been recognized in Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2013, an annual law firm directory. Chambers highlighted 19 of the firm’s practices along with 51 individual firm lawyers in their rankings.

The firm’s Bankruptcy/ RestructuringFranchising and Intellectual Property practices each earned national rankings. >>

Seven Haynes and Boone Partners Selected as Best Lawyers “2013 Lawyers of the Year”

Best Lawyers of America has named seven Haynes and Boone, LLP partners “Lawyers of the Year” in their practices. >>

Haynes and Boone Attorneys Widely Recognized by Texas Super Lawyers

DALLAS – Texas Super Lawyers recognized 89 Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys in its 2012 award listings. >>

Best Lawyers in America 2013 Recognizes Haynes and Boone Lawyers

DALLAS – More than 100 lawyers from Haynes and Boone, LLP are included in The Best Lawyers in America® 2013, an annual referral guide listing outstanding attorneys throughout the U.S. >>



Recent Publications

New EEOC Enforcement Guidance Regarding Employer Use Of Arrest And Conviction Records

Employers who consider arrest and conviction records when making employment decisions should be aware that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”) has issued new enforcement guidance regarding the issue. >>



William C. Strock

Senior Counsel

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, 75219
T +1 214.651.5623
F +1 214.200.0655

Áreas de Practica

Educación

  • J.D., Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law
  • B.B.A., Southern Methodist University

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • Texas Supreme Court
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
William C. Strock

Bill Strock has more than 30 years of experience in Labor and Employment law and has been certified in Labor and Employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1976. Bill served on that Board's Labor and Employment Law Advisory Commission since 1984, and is the former chair of its Labor and Employment Law Exam Commission. In 2004, he was the recipient of the Tom Garner Award from the Texas Board of Legal Specialization for outstanding service. He has been listed in Best Lawyers in America for more than 20 years, and described as one of the top labor and employment lawyers in Chambers USA America's Leading Lawyers for Business, 2004-2013, and voted by his peers in consecutive polls as one of the best lawyers in Dallas as reported in D Magazine, April 2001-2004. He has also been voted by his peers a "Texas Super Lawyer," 2003-2012. In 2000, he was elected a Fellow in the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers. Bill is AV® Peer Review Rated Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell® Law Directory. Bill was selected as Best Lawyers' 2013 Dallas Labor Law Management Lawyer of the Year.

Bill's practice has included matters such as:

  • Defended hundreds of clients facing employment discrimination lawsuits and administrative proceedings, many of which cases have involved class allegations. His extensive experience with complex, class discrimination litigation began in the 1970's while representing many of the national trucking companies in discrimination litigation, including ETMF Freight System in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court discrimination class action decision in ETMF Freight System v. Rodriguez.
  • Successfully defended two potential multi-million dollar class action cases for major oil companies involving employee benefits issues, one on summary judgment, affirmed in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, and one tried to a jury verdict in the Texas state court, which was also affirmed on appeal.
  • Defended Exxon Mobil Corporation in a highly publicized, class-based discrimination lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in U.S. District Court under the Americans with Disabilities Act and secured summary judgment on the basis that the class EEOC sought to represent was not covered by the ADA.
  • Successfully established through appellate court opinions new and more favorable standards for employers on forum selection clauses in employment contracts (Barnette v. URC, 823 S.W. 2d 368) and employee bonus entitlements (Lang v. MBank, 756 S.W. 2d 811).
  • Secured appellate court reversal of NLRB decision and clarified whether union could compel merger of bargaining units through arbitration (Emery Worldwide v. NLRB, 966 F.2d 1003).
  • Successfully argued before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals the issue of an employer's right to defend a safety-based policy under the ADA on business necessity and rejecting the EEOC's published Interpretive Guidance limiting employers to the direct threat test, which Guidance had been given deference by the trial court (EEOC v. Exxon Corporation, 203 F.3d 871 (5th Cir.).
  • Secured ruling from appellate court that affirmed federal district court's action in refusing to remand after removal of a claim for severance pay under an employment contract where the plaintiff also claimed "loss of pension and retirement benefits," based upon ERISA preemption even though plaintiff did not invoke ERISA or make reference to a specific employee benefit plan (Epps v. NCNB Texas, 7 F.3d 1993 ).
  • Secured ruling from Fifth Circuit affirming summary judgment for client upholding releases by multiple plaintiffs in case of first impression, holding that a general release of all claims includes a release of ERISA claims even when the statute is not referenced in the release. (Chaplin v. NationsCredit Corp., 307 F.3d 368).
  • Recently secured ruling from federal district court denying certification of collective action status in a case seeking overtime pay for a large group of employees allegedly improperly classified as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Recent Publications

  • "Lessons From EEOC v. EXXON: Safety Versus Protection of Recovering Substance Abusers Under the ADA"
  • "ADA Mental Disability Protection and Workplace Violence - Avoiding the Hobson's Choice"
  • "Strategies for Retaining Key Employees and Terminating Non-Performers in Key Positions While Protecting Trade Secrets and Confidential Information"

Selected Representative Experience


Representation of a Major National Retailer in Home Entertainment
Represented a major national retailer in home entertainment against claims that the company had misclassified Plaintiff and hundreds of other employees as employees as “exempt” under the Fair Labor Standards Act and requested class certification to assert claims on behalf of all other employees reclassified around the same time. Defeated Plaintiff’s efforts for class certification, filed a motion for summary judgment attacking Plaintiff’s theories of liability and damages, and then settled the claims for a small fraction of the original demand.

Representation of Two Government Contractors in Affirmative Action Compliance Audits
Represented two government contractors, one in Texas and one in Arizona, where OFCCP had found alleged class-wide discrimination in hiring based upon statistical disparities and issued Letters of Violation. In each instance, OFCCP was seeking monetary relief in excess of one million dollars, but through negotiations and by using alternative statistical analyses, a favorable settlement was reached in each matter for a fractional sum of the amount originally claimed by OFCCP.

Trial of Class Action Seeking $30 million in Damages Against International Oil Company
Represented a large international oil company in jury trial in Dallas state district court where plaintiffs asserted a class action composed of numerous former employees who had been terminated in a workforce restructuring. The plaintiff class was seeking additional severance pay benefits under the employer's separation pay plan, plus punitive damages and basing their claims on allegations of fraud and breach of contract. The case also involved very sensitive issues relating to attorney-client privilege and claims of alleged waiver of same; however, rulings were secured from the trial court in the employer's favor. After a one-week trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict for the employer on all counts and gave the plaintiffs no damages. The verdict was appealed and the judgment for our client was upheld.

Memberships

  • American Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section
  • Texas Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section
  • National Financial Industry Employment Law Committee
  • Fellow, The College of Labor and Employment Lawyers

Online Publications

07/13/2012 - New EEOC Enforcement Guidance Regarding Employer Use Of Arrest And Conviction Records
Employers who consider arrest and conviction records when making employment decisions should be aware that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”) has issued new enforcement guidance regarding the issue.

04/18/2011 - Fifth Circuit Rules Harassment Claims Not Viable Under USERRA
On March 22, 2011, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) does not support a cause of action for hostile work environment. This is the first ruling from any Circuit Court regarding the issue.

04/14/2011 - The EEOC Issues Final Regulations Implementing the ADAAA
On September 25, 2008, former President George W. Bush signed the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (the “ADAAA” or the “Act”) into law, broadening the definition of “disability” under the Americans with Disability Act (“ADA”).

02/22/2011 - OSHA 2010 and 2011: A Review of OSHA’s Expanded Enforcement Initiatives in 2010 and the Outlook for 2011
The business community has been placed on notice. OSHA has been actively pursuing its regulatory agenda, while also arming its arsenal to enforce compliance.

02/15/2011 - Supreme Court Again Expands Retaliation Protection
Consistent with its retaliation decisions over the past five years, the United States Supreme Court has revisited and expanded the scope of protection from retaliation under Title VII. In an 8-0 decision issued January 24, 2011, the high court expanded the scope of Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision by concluding that in certain situations, the statute allows an employee who has not personally engaged in protected activity to lodge a retaliation claim under the statute.

07/29/2010 - Litigating Arbitration Agreements: Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions Provide Guidance to Employers Looking to Avoid Court
Despite entering into arbitration agreements with their employees, employers all too often find themselves in court adverse to the very employees who have signed an arbitration agreement. The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued three arbitration decisions that have important implications for employers seeking to avoid the inside of a courtroom.

06/30/2010 - U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Employer Searches and Underscores Importance of Electronic Communications Policies
The United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that provides guidance on steps employers can take to reduce an employee’s privacy expectations and emphasizes the importance of having a clear, well-defined privacy policy.

06/09/2010 - Federal Government Implements Pro-Union Notice Requirement for Government Contractors
Government contractors and subcontractors now have a new, unsavory obligation. On January 30, 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order 13496 – which requires government contractors and subcontractors to post a notice informing employees of their right to engage in concerted, collective activity.

04/22/2010 - Employers Beware: How the Recent Health Care Reform Legislation Affects Employers
On March 21, 2010, the House of Representatives passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which President Obama signed into law on March 23, 2010. The health care reform law will make far-reaching changes to the United States health care system over the next several years. 

06/19/2009 - U.S. Supreme Court Increases Employee Burden of Proof in Age Bias Cases
In Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., decided on June 18, 2009, a deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court imposed a heightened proof burden on employees to establish age discrimination against their employers. In a 5-4 decision, the Court concluded that the literal text of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) does not allow a worker to prove discrimination by demonstrating that age was one “motivating factor” for the employer's adverse employment action.

05/06/2009 - Restructuring Compensation During Economic Challenges
Employers are facing a number of economic and financial challenges. Some employers have considered restructuring their compensation arrangements with employees as an alternative to avoid a reduction in force or layoffs. Restructuring of compensation packages raises a number of issues. 

04/22/2009 - Texas Supreme Court Provides Greater Protection to Employers Seeking to Enforce Non-Compete Covenants
Building on its 2006 decision in Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Johnson, 209 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. 2006), the Texas Supreme Court has further expanded the enforceability of non-compete covenants in the at-will employment setting. In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding, No. 07-0490 (Tex. April 17, 2009), a decision with significant practical implications for Texas employers, the court held that an employer’s implied promise to provide confidential information to an at-will employee may give rise to an enforceable covenant not to compete.

04/09/2009 - Weathering the Storm: Terminations, Uncertainty, and Strategies to Reduce Workplace Liability
In the current economic state, many employers are seeking to reduce operating costs. More employees are being let go as corporate layoffs have accelerated and workers are looking to complain that they have been unfairly or improperly dismissed. The Obama administration has publicly announced that it will be more aggressive in enforcing employment laws.

02/19/2009 - The Opportunities and Risks of the New Federal Stimulus Bill
On February 19th, Haynes and Boone hosted a teleconference examining the business opportunities and risks inherent in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (commonly referred to as the Stimulus Bill). To learn more about how this important new legislation will impact you and your business, please contact your Haynes and Boone attorney. 

02/16/2009 - U.S. Supreme Court Protects Workers from Retaliation in Workplace Discrimination Investigations
On January 26, 2009, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, concluded that Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision protects an employee-witness who “speaks out” about alleged discrimination “not on the employee’s own initiative,” but in answering questions during the employer’s internal investigation.

02/05/2009 - President Obama Signs Three Executive Orders Concerning Unions
On Friday, January 30, 2009, in a move targeting Bush-era policies that some viewed as unfriendly to organized labor, President Barack Obama signed three executive orders: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws; Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts; and Economy in Government Contracting. Regarding these orders, President Obama commented, “We need to level the playing field for workers and the unions that represent their interests. . .”

01/30/2009 - President Obama Signs Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
On Thursday, January 29, 2009, in a widely anticipated move, President Barack Obama signed his first bill into law, approving the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This legislation focuses on salary bias in the workplace. Discussed in greater detail below, the Ledbetter bill essentially negates a 2007 United States Supreme Court decision that limited a woman’s ability to sue for pay discrimination long after the first discriminatory paycheck occurred.

01/20/2009 - House Passes Two “Fair Pay” Bills
On January 9, 2009, the United States House of Representatives passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act. The bills now go to the Senate for consideration, and President Obama is expected to sign both into law should they reach his desk.

11/21/2008 - The ADA’s Rebirth: Complying with the ADA Amendments of 2008
Based on several new amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the statute has been reborn – it offers vastly expanded coverage to a wide variety of employee physical and mental impairments and will require employers to focus on creating and offering reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities. On January 1, 2009, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) will become effective and, in large part, it removes an employer’s common defense that the individual’s particular impairment does not constitute a “disability” under the ADA.

01/11/2008 - Employer Email No-Solicitation Policies
It is well-established that employees have the right, under the mutual aid and protection clause in Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), to solicit coworkers on non-working time and to distribute literature to coworkers in non-work areas.

10/24/2006 - Texas Supreme Court Eases the Requirements on Covenants Not to Compete
On October 20, 2006, the Supreme Court of Texas revisited and revised its landmark ruling in Light v. Centel Cellular Co., 883 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. 1994), the seminal case concerning covenants not to compete in Texas.

05/05/2006 - Possible NLRA Implications - Part II

04/26/2006 - Possible NLRA Implications - Part I

ADA Mental Disability Protection and Workplace Violence - Avoiding the Hobson’s Choice
2001 HR Southwest Human Resources Conference and Exposition

Lessons From EEOC V. EXXON Corporation Substance Abuse V. Safety Issues
SMU Multi-State Labor and Employment Law Seminar

12/01/2000 - New OFCCP Regulations

Strategies for Retaining Key Employees and Terminating Non-Performers In Key Positions
Southern Methodist University Law Review Association’s 8th Annual Corporate Counsel Symposium