Recent Publications

Think Globally, Act Locally (in Your Workplace): Changes to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) recently released a final rule that aligns its hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) with the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (“GHS”). >>



Erin Shea

Associate

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5226
F +1 214.200.0735

Fort Worth


201 Main Street
Suite 2200
Fort Worth, Texas 76102

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, 2009, cum laude
  • B.A., Economics and Political Science, Colorado College, 2003, cum laude

Bar Admissions

  • Texas, 2009

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Erin Shea

Erin Shea is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the Dallas office of Haynes and Boone, LLP. Prior to joining Haynes and Boone, Erin served as a legislative clerk in the office of U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander, and in the Senator's Subcommittee on the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

Erin has assisted employers in a variety of labor and employment matters, including:

  • Defending clients against claims under Title VII, ADA, FMLA, ERISA, FLSA, and OSHA as well as breach of contract and employment-related tort claims.
  • Providing advice and counsel to employers regarding a variety of employment issues, including strategies minimizing risks of litigation, employment policies, wage and hour compliance, FMLA and ADA compliance, and employment agreements.
  • Drafting and/or reviewing employee handbooks, severance and release agreements, employment agreements, non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, and confidentiality agreements.
  • Conducting workplace investigations regarding whistleblower, discrimination, and/or harassment complaints.
  • Providing human resource departments and in-house counsel with employment and safety training, including strategies for investigations and analysis of the risks of litigation.
  • Representing employers in contesting workplace safety citations and defending corporations in actions brought by federal and state departments of labor – including disputes with OSHA or state-equivalents. 

Selected Representative Experience


Davie, Florida, OSHA Late Notice of Contest - Foot Protection and Recordkeeping Violations
OSHA alleged, among other things, that Home Depot employees were not wearing appropriate foot protection, namely, steel toe shoes. We were preparing for trial, including the introduction of expert witness testimony on the foot protection citation, when the Secretary of Labor withdrew the citations before trial, resulting in a complete victory for Home Depot.

New York, New York Eye Wash Exposure and Eye Wash Facilities OSHA ALJ Trial
We represented Home Depot in contesting an OSHA citation in New York where OSHA alleged that the retailer lacked suitable eye wash facilities for treating employees who could supposedly get chemicals in their eyes while cleaning up spills of consumer products in the garden department. We, among other things, challenged whether the agency could meet its burden to prove exposure to any hazardous chemical that would require a 15-minute continuous flush eye wash station. Our efforts resulted in the Secretary of Labor withdrawing the citation on the eve of trial, resulting in a complete victory for Home Depot.

Washington, Safety Committee Variance
We represented Home Depot in applying for a variance from the Washington Division of Occupational Safety and Health ("DOSH") requirement that employers maintain safety committee elections. In doing so, we drafted the variance application and interfaced with DOSH officials regarding the merits of the variance. Our efforts resulted in DOSH awarding Home Depot a permanent variance.

Summary Judgment for Employer in ERISA Benefits Dispute
Successfully obtained summary judgment for American Airlines, Inc. in an ERISA matter where the plaintiff claimed wrongful denial of benefits.

U.S. Secretary of Labor
We represented a manufacturer in the Dallas-Fort Worth area who was cited with more than 40 citations, including alleged willful violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The proposed citation fines were in the six figures. We assisted the client with an aggressive campaign to identify flaws in the investigation methodology, especially in areas of noise conservation and respiratory protection, to present a firm defense at the informal conference. Our response also included the defense of vindictive prosecution by the government. The matter moved to contested proceedings and we obtained a favorable resolution after the hearing with the settlement judge.

Online Publications

04/27/2012 - Think Globally, Act Locally (in Your Workplace): Changes to OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) recently released a final rule that aligns its hazard communication standard (29 C.F.R. § 1910.1200) with the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (“GHS”).

09/23/2011 - The New Workplace Violence Cops: "Whatcha Gonna Do When OSHA Comes For You?
As a result of OSHA’s recently issued directive on workplace violence, the cops may not be alone in investigating incidents of workplace violence. OSHA is now in the business of policing workplace violence.

08/02/2011 - OSHA Warns Employers of More Aggressive Enforcement
Supporting OSHA’s aggressive semi-annual regulatory agenda, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA, Jordan Barab, recently warned a research symposium that, “despite what goes on in Congress, [OSHA] [has] absolutely no intention of pulling back or retreating.” Barab alerted attendees that OSHA’s regulatory agenda aims to extend enforcement beyond traditional manufacturing and construction sectors.

05/11/2011 - OSHA's Catchphrase: General Duty
What if Title VII had a provision that mandated, “in addition to specific protected traits (sex, race, religion, etc.), all employers have an obligation to protect employees from discriminatory conduct based on other recognized traits (smoker, obesity, red hair, etc).” 

02/22/2011 - OSHA 2010 and 2011: A Review of OSHA’s Expanded Enforcement Initiatives in 2010 and the Outlook for 2011
The business community has been placed on notice. OSHA has been actively pursuing its regulatory agenda, while also arming its arsenal to enforce compliance.

02/09/2011 - NLRB Roundup: More Frequent and Significant Action from Obama Appointees
The Obama National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has started to make its mark on the labor laws through a series of changes that collectively may have a significant impact on the labor law environment.

02/03/2011 - Have You Checked The Records? OSHA Continues to Emphasize Recordkeeping Compliance in 2011
After launching a National Emphasis Program (“NEP”) on recordkeeping in 2009, OSHA has focused increasingly more on recordkeeping compliance when conducting workplace inspections.

10/28/2010 - Change is on the Way from the NLRB
The Obama-appointed NLRB has now issued its first significant batch of decisions serving notice, as is typical in the transition from one administration to the next, of a shift in the interpretation of the labor laws. The decisions include a new standard regarding secondary boycotts and union bannering; potential reconsideration of prior precedent; and a differing application of the law to facts than the predecessor NLRB.

07/29/2010 - Litigating Arbitration Agreements: Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions Provide Guidance to Employers Looking to Avoid Court
Despite entering into arbitration agreements with their employees, employers all too often find themselves in court adverse to the very employees who have signed an arbitration agreement. The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued three arbitration decisions that have important implications for employers seeking to avoid the inside of a courtroom.